Why did the Metro-dome roof collapse – shouldn’t it have been designed to withstand a build up of snow?
“Non Engineer” Answer: Yes, it should have.
Explanation: While the Metro-dome should have been designed to withstand a build up of snow, it may have been poorly designed or constructed OR perhaps it just snowed too much. As much as we would like to believe that buildings are designed to be invincible to natural occurrences or other disasters, it’s just not so. When looking into why a building or building component fails, there are several possible contributing factors to consider:
Was this a “design event”?
Was there a “design deficiency”?
Was there a “construction defect”?
What is the “life expectancy” of the building or building component?
A design event occurs when an extreme event subjects the structure to intense loads possibly greater than the building was designed to withstand.
A design deficiency occurs when a building or building component has not been designed to satisfy Code requirements or meet the strength requirements needed to withstand anticipated loads.
A construction defect occurs when a building or building component has not been built the way that the designer intended or the manufacturer requires.
Life expectancy is simply how long a structure is expected to stand and/or remain serviceable.
In order to determine why the Metro-dome roof failed, the engineers tasked with the analysis would need to compare the load that the roof was designed to withstand to the load that caused the roof to fail. Then they will need to review the debris so as to determine the existence and or contribution of any design or construction defects.
Commentary: Without investigation, there is no way to be sure what the cause and/or contributing factors of the Metro-dome collapse was. It is important to note, however that there are times when structural systems can be completely up to Code and built to spec, but still fail when exposed to unlikely, extreme circumstances.